Furious Farke Loses It with Aaronson in Explosive Showdown During Leeds’ Tense Villarreal Draw

August 3, 2025

Brenden Aaronson at a Crossroads: Tactical Misfit or Undervalued Asset at Leeds United?

Saturday’s 1–1 draw with Spanish side Villarreal at Elland Road marked Leeds United’s fourth of five pre-season friendlies ahead of the 2024–25 campaign. Though only a pre-season fixture, it carried an unusually sharp edge. Coming up against a club with regular Champions League pedigree offered Daniel Farke and his squad the chance to measure themselves against elite opposition. But beyond the result, the match spotlighted individual performances — and few were more intriguing, or more complicated, than that of Brenden Aaronson.

The American international was deployed on the right wing, a position he has occupied before, but one that continues to raise questions about his effectiveness and suitability. While Aaronson showed flashes of his usual industry and tidy footwork, the match was punctuated by a moment of visible tension on the touchline: Daniel Farke, known for his high tactical standards, was seen furiously remonstrating with the midfielder after a series of poor decisions involving off-the-ball movement and missed timing with young full-back Schmidt.

This incident — while minor in isolation — is emblematic of a bigger question surrounding Aaronson: where exactly does he fit in this Leeds side? And more importantly, is there a future for him at Elland Road under Farke’s very defined tactical system?


Aaronson’s Return: A Second Chance?

After a difficult first season in English football, which ended in relegation and prompted a loan move to Union Berlin, Brenden Aaronson returned to West Yorkshire this summer looking to reignite his Leeds career. The 23-year-old attacking midfielder arrived from Red Bull Salzburg in 2022 for a significant £25 million fee — a clear statement of ambition from the club at the time. But while his energy and pressing were never in doubt, his lack of end product and lightweight physicality saw him struggle in the Premier League.

At Union Berlin, the struggles continued. Despite the Bundesliga’s reputation for nurturing American talent, Aaronson failed to nail down a consistent starting role. He was often used as a rotational option, accumulating over 30 appearances but only a handful as a starter. His goal contributions were limited, and questions about his ideal role persisted.

Yet, back at Leeds, there was a sense that the reset button had been hit. Daniel Farke included him in the pre-season squad, and Aaronson returned from CONCACAF Gold Cup duty with the United States in time to make an impression. However, after four pre-season matches — and particularly after Saturday’s performance — the signs are beginning to look ominous.


Farke’s System Leaves Little Room for a Classic Number 10

To understand Aaronson’s predicament, one must understand Daniel Farke’s tactical structure. The German coach prefers a 4-3-3 formation, which leans heavily on possession, structured pressing, and vertical transitions. In this system, Farke uses two box-to-box midfielders (“8s”) on either side of a holding midfielder. In Saturday’s game, that trio consisted of:

Ethan Ampadu (holding role)

Anton Stach (left central midfield)

Sean Longstaff (right central midfield)

It’s a balanced, compact unit that offers work rate, defensive cover, and smart link-up play — but it does not accommodate a traditional number 10, the role where Aaronson has traditionally flourished.

Aaronson is at his best when playing behind the striker, operating in the half-spaces, pressing high, and linking midfield to attack with short, incisive passes and intelligent movement. But in Farke’s current setup, that zone is occupied either by the deep midfielders during buildup, or by wide players cutting inside — not a designated playmaker. There is no defined role for a number 10, and even less of one when Leeds play a double pivot in tough matches.

This leaves Aaronson with limited choices: adapt to a new position or become a rotational piece.


The Winger Problem: Stiff Competition Out Wide

Saturday saw Aaronson deployed as a right winger, mostly out of necessity due to injuries. Dan James, Jack Harrison, and new signing Largie Ramazani were all unavailable, meaning Aaronson and Willy Gnonto were asked to occupy the flanks.

While Aaronson didn’t look uncomfortable technically, it was clear he’s not a natural wide player. He lacks the raw pace of James or Gnonto, the directness of Harrison, and the take-on ability of Ramazani. His strengths lie in quick interplay and movement through the middle — not in beating full-backs 1v1 or hugging the touchline. The link-up with right-back Schmidt was awkward and disjointed. On two occasions, a lack of chemistry between the pair led to wasted attacking sequences — one of which drew a visible outburst from Farke.

Given that all four of the aforementioned wide men are expected to be fit and in contention once the season begins, Aaronson’s standing in the winger pecking order is likely fourth or fifth. And that’s without accounting for the possibility of a late-summer signing.


Farke’s Assessment: Praise with an Asterisk

To his credit, Farke did acknowledge Aaronson’s work rate post-match. He noted that the American “put in a good shift,” particularly given that he had only recently returned to full training. And this is important — Farke is not questioning Aaronson’s effort or attitude. The concern lies in fit.

Farke is a perfectionist. His tactical systems require precision, spatial awareness, and decision-making. Aaronson’s failure to read Schmidt’s overlapping run — followed by failing to make a supporting run moments later — wasn’t just a lapse in judgment. It was, to Farke, a breakdown in structure. In a team that demands coordinated pressing and positional interchange, one misstep can unravel a phase of play.

This moment could be brushed off in isolation, but in the broader context of Aaronson’s ambiguous role, it raises an important question: is he trying to play his game inside a system that doesn’t suit him?


The USMNT Angle: A World Cup Looms

Aaronson’s club situation is not just a domestic issue — it has international consequences. The U.S. Men’s National Team is in a period of tactical evolution under Gregg Berhalter, and the player pool is deeper than it’s been in decades.

In recent camps, Aaronson’s place has not been guaranteed. He faces competition from the likes of:

Gio Reyna

Malik Tillman

Paxten Aaronson (his younger brother)

Luca de la Torre

Cade Cowell / Kevin Paredes (wide attacking depth)

With the 2026 World Cup set to take place on home soil, Aaronson knows the next two seasons are pivotal. If he can’t secure regular minutes at Leeds — or at another club — he risks becoming an afterthought in a rapidly improving U.S. squad.


What Are the Options?

With the season opener approaching and Leeds likely to finalize their squad before the window closes, Aaronson’s future could go one of three ways:

  1. Stay and Adapt

Aaronson may choose to remain at Leeds, fight for his place, and try to adapt to a wider role or a deeper midfield position. This path requires patience, tactical flexibility, and a bit of luck in terms of injuries or rotation.

  1. Pursue a Loan

A loan move could offer regular football and allow Aaronson to reestablish rhythm. A club playing a 4-2-3-1 or a diamond midfield could use him as a central playmaker. The Championship, Eredivisie, Bundesliga, or even an ambitious MLS club (like St. Louis, LAFC, or Philadelphia Union) could be viable options.

  1. Permanent Transfer

If Aaronson feels his time at Leeds is over — or if Leeds receive a strong offer — a permanent move may be best. He’s still only 23 and carries international experience and Champions League exposure. A full reset could benefit both parties.


Conclusion: A Defining Season Ahead

Brenden Aaronson’s performance against Villarreal may not have been disastrous, but it served as a microcosm of his larger issue at Leeds: he is a talented player struggling to find his place in a system that doesn’t naturally accommodate his skillset. While he remains a valuable squad member, his chances of starting regularly look slim unless something fundamental changes — either in terms of tactics or squad structure.

With a World Cup on the horizon and a career still very much in its formative years, Aaronson faces a pivotal decision. Stay and adapt? Leave and rebuild? Or risk stagnating on the periphery?

One thing is clear: the next month — both in terms of the transfer window and tactical developments — will likely determine the next chapter in Brenden Aaronson’s career.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *