“West Ham Owner David Sullivan Spotted on Phone with Agent Will Salthouse After Fullkrug Substitution Drama”

David Sullivan was seen immediately jumping on the phone following the substitution of Niclas Fullkrug during West Ham’s 1-1 draw with Brighton on Saturday, according to The Telegraph. The sighting has sparked speculation, especially as the club’s owner was seated next to his favoured agent, Will Salthouse, at the time.

Matt Law of The Telegraph reported on December 21st that Sullivan’s phone call and proximity to Salthouse could hint at behind-the-scenes discussions, possibly related to Fullkrug’s future or transfer targets for the club. With West Ham’s ongoing pursuit of reinforcements, all eyes are now on the club’s next moves in the transfer window.

“David Sullivan Spotted on Phone After Fullkrug’s Lackluster Performance – Could a Transfer Be on the Horizon?”

David Sullivan was seen on the phone immediately after Niclas Fullkrug’s disappointing full Premier League debut during West Ham’s 1-1 draw with Brighton, sparking speculation about the striker’s future. While it remains unclear who Sullivan was speaking to or if the call was connected to Fullkrug’s performance, The Telegraph’s Matt Law suggested that the West Ham owner might be seeking answers regarding the striker’s transfer.

Fullkrug, who had failed to impress in his first full league appearance, has yet to fully establish himself since his arrival. If his form continues to fall short, Sullivan may feel compelled to reassess the striker’s role at the club, potentially leading to a swift move in the January transfer window. The situation has certainly left fans wondering if Fullkrug’s time at West Ham could be shorter than expected.

“Is Fullkrug’s £27m Move a Mistake? Lopetegui and Steidten Face Questions After Underwhelming Brighton Performance”

West Ham’s £27 million investment in Niclas Fullkrug is now under scrutiny following his disappointing performance against Brighton at the London Stadium on Saturday. With the striker turning 32 in February, concerns are growing about whether the hefty price tag was justified.

Manager Julen Lopetegui and sporting director Tim Steidten may now be questioning the deal as Fullkrug, who has struggled to make a significant impact, continues to underperform. The decision to spend such a large sum on a striker approaching his 32nd birthday is raising eyebrows, especially when the Hammers are already grappling with inconsistent attacking form.

As Fullkrug’s struggles persist, the pressure is mounting on both Lopetegui and Steidten to evaluate whether the transfer was a wise investment or a costly mistake that could affect the club’s plans moving forward.

“Fullkrug’s Struggles Raise Questions Over £27m Signing: Is Lopetegui and Steidten’s Decision Under Fire?”

While Niclas Fullkrug deserves more time to regain his form after missing much of the first half of the season due to injury, his underwhelming performances so far are inevitably sparking doubts about his £27m move to West Ham.

The striker, who has yet to make a significant impact, is now at the center of scrutiny, with many questioning whether Julen Lopetegui and Tim Steidten made the right call in bringing the 32-year-old to London. Despite his pedigree in the Bundesliga, Fullkrug’s struggles in the Premier League are forcing both the manager and sporting director to defend their decision, especially with such a hefty price tag on the line.

As Fullkrug looks to regain his momentum, the pressure on Lopetegui and Steidten to justify the transfer is only increasing.

“Steidten Under Scrutiny for Fullkrug Signing: Should He Take More Responsibility for £27m Move?”

While Niclas Fullkrug’s struggles continue at West Ham, questions are mounting about the role of sporting director Tim Steidten in the £27 million deal. Steidten, who was the driving force behind bringing the former Borussia Dortmund striker to East London, is now facing increased scrutiny over the decision.

Fullkrug, who has yet to find his footing in the Premier League, has failed to justify the hefty price tag, leading many to wonder whether Steidten underestimated the challenges the 31-year-old would face in the English top flight. As the pressure builds on both the player and those responsible for the transfer, Steidten’s ability to back his choices will come under even closer examination in the coming weeks.

“Fullkrug ‘Very Upset’ with West Ham Situation Just Months After £27m Arrival: What’s Going Wrong?”

Niclas Fullkrug is reportedly “very upset” with his current situation at West Ham, just months after completing his £27 million move from Borussia Dortmund, according to Christian Falk. The striker’s frustration is evident as he continues to struggle for form and regular minutes under Julen Lopetegui.

Despite arriving with high expectations, Fullkrug has yet to make a significant impact, leaving him disheartened and questioning his role at the club. With less than six months into his West Ham tenure, his discontent adds another layer of uncertainty to the £27 million investment, further raising questions about the club’s decision to sign the 31-year-old striker.

As Fullkrug wrestles with his West Ham frustration, the club’s management and sporting director Tim Steidten will have to carefully assess whether they made the right call bringing the German forward to East London.

“Fullkrug’s Frustration Could Lead to January Exit: Will Sullivan Cut Losses on £27m Signing?”

Given Niclas Fullkrug’s ongoing frustration and struggles at West Ham, it wouldn’t be a surprise if club owner David Sullivan decides to cut his losses and offload the Germany international in the January transfer window.

With Fullkrug “very upset” about his situation just months into his £27 million move, the striker’s future at the London Stadium looks increasingly uncertain. Sullivan, who has overseen several high-profile moves in recent years, may now be forced to reevaluate the deal and consider recouping some of the hefty investment.

If Fullkrug’s situation doesn’t improve, the club could be looking for a quick exit strategy next year, with the 31-year-old’s underwhelming performances making him a potential liability for the club’s long-term plans.